Tarif Ruhm Geist shoe branding europe bvba v adidas and ohim rostig Fossil akzeptieren
Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
General Court of the European Union PRESS RELEASE No 24/18 adidas may oppose the registration, as an EU trade mark, of two paral
CURIA - Documents
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat
CURIA - Documentos
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel stripes placed on the side of sports shoes
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments
Shoe Branding Europe v. Adidas: Case History - Trademark - India
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer
Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Adidas Successful in Three-stripe Opposition Case
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky